<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 1.0, 2.0 &amp; 3.0 &#8211; A Three Part Act In Plain English</title>
	<atom:link href="http://havahula.org/2009/06/11/web-10-20-30-a-three-part-act-in-plain-english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://havahula.org/2009/06/11/web-10-20-30-a-three-part-act-in-plain-english/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://havahula.org/2009/06/11/web-10-20-30-a-three-part-act-in-plain-english/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havahula.org/?p=181#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Natasha, thanks for talking with me about it and pushing me to do it! I like the question of defining what is &quot;meaningful&quot; -- can we collectively agree on even a facet of that? is agreement necessary or even desirable? I think it may come down to perspective, which would be a good place to arrive at since that is something that can shared and visualized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natasha, thanks for talking with me about it and pushing me to do it! I like the question of defining what is &#8220;meaningful&#8221; &#8212; can we collectively agree on even a facet of that? is agreement necessary or even desirable? I think it may come down to perspective, which would be a good place to arrive at since that is something that can shared and visualized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://havahula.org/2009/06/11/web-10-20-30-a-three-part-act-in-plain-english/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havahula.org/?p=181#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thanks, this is a great post and was well worth the wait.  3.0 is totally intriguing, with the total connection overlayed with emerging patterns - I agree with Geoff, hopefully its a move towards more meaningful connections, although maybe the we will also need a definition of &quot;meaningful.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, this is a great post and was well worth the wait.  3.0 is totally intriguing, with the total connection overlayed with emerging patterns &#8211; I agree with Geoff, hopefully its a move towards more meaningful connections, although maybe the we will also need a definition of &#8220;meaningful.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://havahula.org/2009/06/11/web-10-20-30-a-three-part-act-in-plain-english/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havahula.org/?p=181#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Geoff! Truth be known, there have been some exponential leaps already, right? :)
http://topicsforhumans.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Geoff! Truth be known, there have been some exponential leaps already, right? :)<br />
<a  href="http://topicsforhumans.com/" rel="nofollow">http://topicsforhumans.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff</title>
		<link>http://havahula.org/2009/06/11/web-10-20-30-a-three-part-act-in-plain-english/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havahula.org/?p=181#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Nice, clear overview.  I HOPE that we&#039;re moving towards meaning, and away from singular (selfish) pursuits, but I don&#039;t think there&#039;ll be an evolutionary leap in that department. It think it&#039;s more likely to be a long slow process... 50 years, 100? 1000? Don&#039;t know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, clear overview.  I HOPE that we&#8217;re moving towards meaning, and away from singular (selfish) pursuits, but I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;ll be an evolutionary leap in that department. It think it&#8217;s more likely to be a long slow process&#8230; 50 years, 100? 1000? Don&#8217;t know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

